Multi-criteria decision-making for solving transport sustainability issues: an overview
Abstract
With the recognition of the impact of the transport sector on climate change and human health, decision-makers are under the pressure to shape the transport sector in a more sustainable way, considering more sustainable options and technologies. Besides that, it is also important to ensure such aspects as affordability, security, reliability and convenience of transport services and the effective functioning of the whole system. Therefore, transport-related policy actions require not only an economic point of view, but also environmental and social actions. The article aims to overview the application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques for solving sustainability issues in the transport sector and to provide the main insights for methods and sustainability criteria selection. The Search, Appraisal, Synthesis and Analysis (SALSA) framework and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement were applied as the basis for the research. The detailed content analysis of studies is arranged according to the application areas and the methods applied. In order to increase the applicability of the performed analysis and to simplify the decision-making for further studies, the thematic areas for criteria selection are proposed, the most popular MCDM techniques alongside their advantages and disadvantages are briefly discussed.
Keyword : transport sustainability, sustainable development, multi-criteria, MCDM, SALSA, PRISMA
How to Cite
Šikšnelytė-Butkienė, I., Štreimikienė, D., Baležentis, T., & Agnusdei, L. (2024). Multi-criteria decision-making for solving transport sustainability issues: an overview. Transport, 39(3), 264–286. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2024.22915
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Al-Kaabi, M. J.; Maraqa, M. A.; Hawas, Y. S. 2020. Development of a composite sustainability index for roadway intersection design alternatives in the UAE, Sustainability 12(20): 8696. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208696
Aljohani, K.; Thompson, R. G. 2019. A stakeholder-based evaluation of the most suitable and sustainable delivery fleet for freight consolidation policies in the inner-city area, Sustainability 11(1): 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010124
Alzouby, A. M.; Nusair, A. A.; Taha, L. M. 2019. GIS based multi criteria decision analysis for analyzing accessibility of the disabled in the Greater Irbid municipality area, Irbid, Jordan, Alexandria Engineering Journal 58(2): 689–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2019.05.015
Antanasijević, D.; Pocajt, V.; Ristić, M.; Perić-Grujić, A. 2017. A differential multi-criteria analysis for the assessment of sustainability performance of European countries: beyond country ranking, Journal of Cleaner Production 165: 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.131
Awad-Núñez, S.; González-Cancelas, N.; Soler-Flores, F.; Camarero-Orive, A. 2015. How should the sustainability of the location of dry ports be measured? A proposed methodology using Bayesian networks and multi-criteria decision analysis, Transport 30(3): 312–319. https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2015.1081618
Awasthi, A.; Govindan, K.; Gold, S. 2018. Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach, International Journal of Production Economics 195: 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.013
Azapagic, A.; Chalabi, Z.; Fletcher, T.; Grundy, C.; Jones, M.; Leonardi, G.; Osammor, O.; Sharifi, V.; Swithenbank, J.; Tiwary, A.; Vardoulakis, S. 2013. An integrated approach to assessing the environmental and health impacts of pollution in the urban environment: methodology and a case study, Process Safety and Environmental Protection 91(6): 508–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2012.11.004
Bai, C.; Fahimnia, B.; Sarkis, J. 2017. Sustainable transport fleet appraisal using a hybrid multi-objective decision making approach, Annals of Operations Research 250(2): 309–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-2009-z
Bana e Costa, C. A.; De Corte J.-M.; Vansnick, J.-C. 2012. MACBETH, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 11(2): 359–387. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622012400068
Bandeira, R. A. M.; D’Agosto, M. A.; Ribeiro, S. K.; Bandeira, A. P. F.; Goes, G. V. 2018. A fuzzy multi-criteria model for evaluating sustainable urban freight transportation operations, Journal of Cleaner Production 184: 727–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.234
Barfod, M. B. 2018. Supporting sustainable transport appraisals using stakeholder involvement and MCDA, Transport 33(4): 1052–1066. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2018.6596
Barfod, M. B.; Salling, K. B. 2015. A new composite decision support framework for strategic and sustainable transport appraisals, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 72: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.12.001
Barradale, M. J.; Cornet, Y. 2018. Developing assessment criteria for sustainable transport appraisal, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2672(3): 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118799033
Bivina, G. R.; Parida, M. 2020. Prioritizing pedestrian needs using a multi-criteria decision approach for a sustainable built environment in the Indian context, Environment, Development and Sustainability 22(5): 4929–4950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00381-w
Blagojević, A.; Stević, Ž.; Marinković, D.; Kasalica, S.; Rajilić, S. 2020. A novel entropy-fuzzy PIPRECIA-DEA model for safety evaluation of railway traffic, Symmetry 12(9): 1479. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12091479
Boisjoly, G.; El-Geneidy, A. M. 2017. How to get there? A critical assessment of accessibility objectives and indicators in metropolitan transportation plans, Transport Policy 55: 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.12.011
Bouhana, A.; Zidi, A.; Fekih, A.; Chabchoub, H.; Abed, M. 2015. An ontology-based CBR approach for personalized itinerary search systems for sustainable urban freight transport, Expert Systems with Applications 42(7): 3724–3741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.12.012
Brans, J. P.; Mareschal, B. 1992. PROMETHEE V: MCDM problems with segmentation constraints, INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research 30(2): 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/03155986.1992.11732186
Brauers, W. K. M.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2010. Project management by MULTIMOORA as an instrument for transition economies, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 16(1): 5–24. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.01
Broniewicz, E; Ogrodnik, K. 2020. Multi-criteria analysis of transport infrastructure projects, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 83: 102351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102351
Brůhová Foltýnová, H.; Vejchodská, E.; Rybová, K.; Květoň, V. 2020. Sustainable urban mobility: one definition, different stakeholders’ opinions, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 87: 102465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102465
Bulckaen, J; Keseru, I; Macharis, C. 2016. Sustainability versus stakeholder preferences: Searching for synergies in urban and regional mobility measures, Research in Transportation Economics 55: 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2016.04.009
Cadena, P. C. B.; Magro, J. M. V. 2015. Setting the weights of sustainability criteria for the appraisal of transport projects, Transport 30(3): 298–306. https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2015.1086890
Casanovas-Rubio, M. M.; Ramos, G.; Armengou, J. 2020. Minimizing the social impact of construction work on mobility: a decision-making method, Sustainability 12(3): 1183. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031183
Castillo, H.; Pitfield, D. E. 2010. ELASTIC – a methodological framework for identifying and selecting sustainable transport indicators, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 15(4): 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2009.09.002
Chen, C.; Achtari, G.; Majkut, K.; Sheu, J.-B. 2017. Balancing equity and cost in rural transportation management with multi-objective utility analysis and data envelopment analysis: a case of Quinte West, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 95: 148–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.10.015
Chen, Z.-S.; Li, M.; Kong, W.-T.; Chin, K.-S. 2019. Evaluation and selection of HazMat transportation alternatives: a PHFLTS- and TOPSIS-integrated multi-perspective approach, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16(21): 4116. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214116
Cieśla, M.; Sobota, A.; Jacyna, M. 2020. Multi-criteria decision making process in metropolitan transport means selection based on the sharing mobility idea, Sustainability 12(17): 7231. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177231
Cornet, Y.; Barradale, M. J.; Barfod, M. B.; Hickman, R. 2018. Giving current and future generations a real voice: a practical method for constructing sustainability viewpoints in transport appraisal, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 18(3): 316–339. https://doi.org/10.18757/EJTIR.2018.18.3.3244
Corral, S; Hernandez, Y. 2017. Social sensitivity analyses applied to environmental assessment processes, Ecological Economics 141: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.05.022
Del Amo, I. F.; Erkoyuncu, J. A.; Roy, R.; Palmarini, R.; Onoufriou, D. 2018. A systematic review of augmented reality content-related techniques for knowledge transfer in maintenance applications, Computers in Industry 103: 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.08.007
Delibasic, M. 2022. Institutional imbalance of interests in maritime transport and sustainable development, Transformations in Business & Economics 21(1): 263–273.
Dimitriou, H. T; Ward, E. J; Dean, M. 2016. Presenting the case for the application of multi-criteria analysis to mega transport infrastructure project appraisal, Research in Transportation Economics 58: 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2016.08.002
Duleba, S.; Moslem, S. 2018. Sustainable urban transport development with stakeholder participation, an AHP-Kendall model: a case study for Mersin, Sustainability 10(10): 3647. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103647
EC. 2019. The European Green Deal. European Commission (EC). Available from Internet: https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en
Edwards, W. 1977. How to use multiattribute utility measurement for social decisionmaking, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 7(5): 326–340. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1977.4309720
Edwards, W.; Barron, F. H. 1994. SMARTS and SMARTER: improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 60(3): 306–325. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1087
Ekener, E.; Hansson, J.; Larsson, A.; Peck, P. 2018. Developing life cycle sustainability assessment methodology by applying values-based sustainability weighting – tested on biomass based and fossil transportation fuels, Journal of Cleaner Production 181: 337–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.211
Erdogan, M.; Kaya, I. 2019. Prioritizing failures by using hybrid multi criteria decision making methodology with a real case application, Sustainable Cities and Society 45: 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.027
Eurostat. 2024. Database. Available from Internet: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database
Feitó-Cespón, M.; Sarache, W.; Piedra-Jimenez, F.; Cespón-Castro, R. 2017. Redesign of a sustainable reverse supply chain under uncertainty: a case study, Journal of Cleaner Production 151: 206–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.057
Fishburn, P. C. 1967. Methods of estimating additive utilities, Management Science 13(7): 435–453. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.13.7.435
Gabus, A.; Fontela, E. 1972. World Problems, An Invitation to Further Thought Within the Framework of DEMATEL. Battelle Geneva Research Center, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ghorbanzadeh, O.; Moslem, S.; Blaschke, T.; Duleba, S. 2019. Sustainable urban transport planning considering different stakeholder groups by an interval-AHP decision support model, Sustainability 11(1): 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010009
Gomes, L.; Lima, M. 1991. TODIM: basics and application to multicriteria ranking of projects with environmental impacts, Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences 16(3–4): 113–127.
Grant M. J.; Booth A. 2009. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies, Health Information & Libraries Journal 26(2): 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Griškevičiūtė-Gečienė, A. 2010. The evaluation of investment projects within the territory of development, Transport 25(2): 203–214. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2010.25
Henke, I.; Cartenì, A.; Di Francesco, L. 2020. A Sustainable evaluation processes for investments in the transport sector: a combined multi-criteria and cost–benefit analysis for a new highway in Italy, Sustainability 12(23): 9854. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239854
Hickman, R.; Saxena, S.; Banister, D.; Ashiru, O. 2012. Examining transport futures with scenario analysis and MCA, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 46(3): 560–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.11.006
Höfer, T.; Madlener, R. 2020. A participatory stakeholder process for evaluating sustainable energy transition scenarios, Energy Policy 139: 111277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111277
Huang, H.; De Smet, Y.; Macharis, C.; Doan, N. A. V. 2021. Collaborative decision-making in sustainable mobility: identifying possible consensuses in the multi-actor multi-criteria analysis based on inverse mixed-integer linear optimization, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 28(1): 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1795005
Hwang, C.-L.; Yoon, K. 1981. Methods for multiple attribute decision making, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 186: 58–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3
Jacyna, M. 2006. The multiobjective optimisation to evaluation of the infrastructure adjustment to transport needs, in K. G. Goulias (Ed.). Transport Science and Technology, 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1108/9780080467542-031
Jakimavičius, M.; Burinskienė, M. 2009. A GIS and multi‐criteria‐based analysis and ranking of transportation zones of Vilnius city, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 15(1): 39–48. https://doi.org/10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.39-48
Jasti, P. C.; Ram, V. V. 2019a. Integrated and sustainable benchmarking of metro rail system using analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy logic: a case study of Mumbai, Urban Rail Transit 5(3): 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40864-019-00107-1
Jasti, P. C.; Ram, V. V. 2019b. Sustainable benchmarking of a public transport system using analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy logic: a case study of Hyderabad, India, Public Transport 11(3): 457–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-019-00219-8
Jones, S.; Tefe, M.; Appiah-Opoku, S. 2013. Proposed framework for sustainability screening of urban transport projects in developing countries: A case study of Accra, Ghana, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 49: 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.003
Josimović, B.; Krunić, N.; Nenković-Riznić, M. 2016. The impact of airport noise as part of a strategic environmental assessment, case study: the Tivat (Montenegro) airport expansion plan, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 49: 271–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.10.005
Karolemeas, C.; Tsigdinos, S.; Tzouras, P. G.; Nikitas, A.; Bakogiannis, E. 2021. Determining electric vehicle charging station location suitability: a qualitative study of Greek stakeholders employing thematic analysis and analytical hierarchy process, Sustainability 13(4): 2298. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042298
Keeney, R. L. 1982. Decision analysis: an overview, Operations Research 30(5): 803–838. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.30.5.803
Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H. 1993. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press. 592 p.
Keršulienė, V.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. 2010. Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA), Journal of Business Economics and Management 11(2): 243–258. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2010.12
Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Olfat, L., Turskis, Z. 2015. Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS), Informatica 26(3): 435–451. https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2015.57
Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z.; Antuchevičienė, J. 2016. A new combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method for multi-criteria decision-making, Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research 50(3): 25–44. Available from Internet: https://ecocyb.ase.ro/nr20163/02%20-%20Mehdi%20K.%20GHORABAEE,%20Ed.%20Zavadskas(T).pdf
Keshkamat, S. S.; Looijen, J. M.; Zuidgeest, M. H. P. 2009. The formulation and evaluation of transport route planning alternatives: a spatial decision support system for the Via Baltica project, Poland, Journal of Transport Geography 17(1): 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.04.010
Kijewska, K.; Torbacki, W.; Iwan, S. 2018. Application of AHP and DEMATEL methods in choosing and analysing the measures for the distribution of goods in Szczecin region, Sustainability 10(7): 2365. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072365
Krajangsri, T.; Pongpeng, J. 2019. Sustainable infrastructure assessment model: an application to road projects, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 23(3): 973–984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-1007-0
Kramar, U.; Dragan, D.; Topolšek, D. 2019. The holistic approach to urban mobility planning with a modified focus group, swot, and fuzzy analytical hierarchical process, Sustainability 11(23): 6599. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236599
Kumar, A.; Anbanandam, R. 2021. Environmentally responsible freight transport service providers’ assessment under data-driven information uncertainty, Journal of Enterprise Information Management 34(1): 506–542. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-12-2019-0403
Le Boennec, R.; Nicolaï, I.; Da Costa, P. 2019. Assessing 50 innovative mobility offers in low-density areas: a French application using a two-step decision-aid method, Transport Policy 83: 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.08.003
Lebeau, P.; Macharis, C.; Van Mierlo, J.; Janjevic, M. 2018. Improving policy support in city logistics: the contributions of a multi-actor multi-criteria analysis, Case Studies on Transport Policy 6(4): 554–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.07.003
Lee, J.; Arts, J.; Vanclay, F. 2021. Stakeholder views about land use and transport integration in a rapidly-growing megacity: social outcomes and integrated planning issues in Seoul, Sustainable Cities and Society 67: 102759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102759
Ma, F.; Shi, W.; Yuen, K. F.; Sun, Q.; Guo, Y. R. 2019. Multi-stakeholders’ assessment of bike sharing service quality based on DEMATEL–VIKOR method, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications: a Leading Journal of Supply Chain Management 22(5): 449–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2019.1568401
MacCrimmon, K. R. 1968. Decision making Among Multiple-Attribute Alternatives: A Survey and Consolidated Approach. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, US. 78 p. Available from Internet: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/RM4823.html
Macharis, C.; Milan, L. 2015. Transition through dialogue: a stakeholder based decision process for cities: the case of city distribution, Habitat International 45: 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.06.026
Macharis, C.; Turcksin, L.; Lebeau, K. 2012. Multi actor multi criteria analysis (MAMCA) as a tool to support sustainable decisions: state of use, Decision Support Systems 54(1): 610–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.08.008
Marleau Donais, F.; Abi-Zeid, I.; Waygood, E. O. D.; Lavoie, R. 2019. Assessing and ranking the potential of a street to be redesigned as a complete street: a multi-criteria decision aiding approach, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 124: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.02.006
Mohagheghi, V.; Mousavi, S. M.; Aghamohagheghi, M.; Vahdani, B. 2017. A new approach of multi-criteria analysis for the evaluation and selection of sustainable transport investment projects under uncertainty: a case study, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 10(1): 605–626. https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.2017.10.1.41
Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D. G. 2010. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement, International Journal of Surgery 8(5): 336–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007
Moslem, S.; Campisi, T.; Szmelter-Jarosz, A.; Duleba, S.; Nahiduzzaman, K. M.; Tesoriere, G. 2020. Best–worst method for modelling mobility choice after COVID-19: Evidence from Italy, Sustainability 12(17): 6824. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176824
Moslem, S.; Ghorbanzadeh, O.; Blaschke, T.; Duleba, S. 2019. Analysing stakeholder consensus for a sustainable transport development decision by the fuzzy AHP and interval AHP, Sustainability 11(12): 3271. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123271
Mukherjee, S. 2017. Selection of alternative fuels for sustainable urban transportation under multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy environment, Fuzzy Information and Engineering 9(1): 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fiae.2017.03.006
Munda, G. 1995. Multicriteria Evaluation in a Fuzzy Environment: Theory and Applications in Ecological Economics. Springer. 255 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-49997-5
Munier, N. 2016. A new approach to the rank reversal phenomenon in MCDM with the SIMUS method, Multiple Criteria Decision Making 11: 137–152. https://doi.org/10.22367/mcdm.2016.11.09
Neofytou, H.; Sarafidis, Y.; Gkonis, N.; Mirasgedis, S.; Askounis, D. 2020. Energy efficiency contribution to sustainable development: a multi-criteria approach in Greece, Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 15(10–12): 572–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2020.1849449
Nguyen, T. T.; Brunner, H.; Hirz, M. 2020. Towards a holistic sustainability evaluation for transport alternatives, European Journal of Sustainable Development 9(4): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2020.v9n4p1
Nowakowski, P.; Król, A. 2021. The influence of preliminary processing of end-of-life tires on transportation cost and vehicle exhausts emissions, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28(19): 24256–24269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07421-y
Ogrodnik, K. 2020. Multi-criteria analysis of smart cities in Poland, Geographia Polonica 93(2): 163–181. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0168
Oltean-Dumbrava, C.; Miah, A. 2016. Assessment and relative sustainability of common types of roadside noise barriers, Journal of Cleaner Production 135: 919–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.107
Oltean-Dumbrava, C.; Watts, G.; Miah, A. 2016. Towards a more sustainable surface transport infrastructure: a case study of applying multi criteria analysis techniques to assess the sustainability of transport noise reducing devices, Journal of Cleaner Production 112: 2922–2934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.096
Oltean-Dumbrava, C.; Watts, G.; Miah, A. 2013. Transport infrastructure: making more sustainable decisions for noise reduction, Journal of Cleaner Production 42: 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.008
Opricović, S. 1998. Višekriterijumska optimizacija sistema u građevinarstvu. Doktorska disertacija. Građevinski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Srbija. 302 s. (in Serbian).
Ortega, J.; Moslem, S.; Tóth, J.; Péter, T.; Palaguachi, J.; Paguay, M. 2020. Using best worst method for sustainable park and ride facility location, Sustainability 12(23): 10083. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310083
Oses, U.; Rojí, E.; Gurrutxaga, I.; Larrauri, M. 2017. A multidisciplinary sustainability index to assess transport in urban areas: a case study of Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 60(11): 1891–1922. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1264374
Palevičius, V.; Burinskienė, M.; Podvezko, V.; Paliulis, G. M.; Šarkienė, E.; Šaparauskas, J. 2016. Research on the demand for parking lots of shopping centres, E&M Economics and Management 19(3): 173–194. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2016-3-012
Pamucar, D.; Deveci, M.; Canıtez, F.; Bozanic, D. 2020. A fuzzy full consistency method-Dombi-Bonferroni model for prioritizing transportation demand management measures, Applied Soft Computing 87: 105952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105952
Pamučar, D.; Ćirović, G. 2015. The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC), Expert Systems with Applications 42(6): 3016–3028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.057
Pamučar, D.; Stević, Ž.; Sremac, S. 2018. A new model for determining weight coefficients of criteria in MCDM models: full consistency method (FUCOM), Symmetry 10(9): 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10090393
Paul, A.; Moktadir, M. A.; Paul, S. K. 2020. An innovative decision-making framework for evaluating transportation service providers based on sustainable criteria, International Journal of Production Research 58(24): 7334–7352. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1652779
Pettit, C.; Chung, W.; Sharifi, V.; Chalabi, Z.; Fletcher, T.; Cleall, P.; Thomas, H.; De Munck, C.; Sinnett, D.; Jefferies, S.; Jones, M.; Azapagic, A. 2011. Sustainable management of urban pollution: an integrated approach, Building Services Engineering Research and Technology 32(1): 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143624410394528
Phdungsilp, A. 2010. Integrated energy and carbon modeling with a decision support system: Policy scenarios for low-carbon city development in Bangkok, Energy Policy 38(9): 4808–4817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.026
Pryn, M. R.; Cornet, Y.; Salling, K. B. 2015. Applying sustainability theory to transport infrastructure assessment using a multiplicative AHP decision support model, Transport 30(3): 330–341. https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2015.1081281
Raiffa, H. 1997. Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices under Uncertainty. McGraw-Hill. 309 p.
Rezaei, J. 2015. Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method, Omega 53: 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009
Ribeiro, P.; Fonseca, F.; Santos, P. 2020. Sustainability assessment of a bus system in a mid-sized municipality, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 63(2): 236–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2019.1577224
Roy, B. 1968. Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples (la méthode ELECTRE), R.I.R.O 2(8): 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/196802V100571 (in French).
Rybarczyk, G.; Wu, C. 2010. Bicycle facility planning using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis, Applied Geography 30(2): 282–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.08.005
Rześny-Cieplińska, J.; Szmelter-Jarosz, A.; Moslem, S. 2021. Priority-based stakeholders analysis in the view of sustainable city logistics: evidence for Tricity, Poland, Sustainable Cities and Society 67: 102751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102751
Saaty, T. L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill. 287 p.
Saaty, T. L. 2001. The Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback. 2nd edition. RWS Publications. 370 p.
Sałabun, W. 2015. The characteristic objects method: a new distance-based approach to multicriteria decision-making problems, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Optimization, Learning, and Decision Support 22(1–2): 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1525
Sałabun, W.; Palczewski, K.; Wątróbski, J. 2019. Multicriteria approach to sustainable transport evaluation under incomplete knowledge: electric bikes case study, Sustainability 11(12): 3314. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123314
Salling, K. B.; Barfod, M. B.; Pryn, M. R.; Leleur, S. 2018. Flexible decision support for sustainable development: the SUSTAIN framework model, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 18(3): 295–315. https://doi.org/10.18757/ejtir.2018.18.3.3242
Salling, K. B.; Pryn, M. R. 2015. Sustainable transport project evaluation and decision support: indicators and planning criteria for sustainable development, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 22(4): 346–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2015.1051497
San-José Lombera, J. T.; Cuadrado, J. 2010. Industrial building design stage based on a system approach to their environmental sustainability, Construction and Building Materials 24(4): 438–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.10.019
Sayyadi, R.; Awasthi, A. 2020. An integrated approach based on system dynamics and ANP for evaluating sustainable transportation policies, International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics 7(2): 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2018.1554168
Schmale, J.; Von Schneidemesser, E.; Dörrie, A. 2015. An integrated assessment method for sustainable transport system planning in a middle sized German city, Sustainability 7(2): 1329–1354. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7021329
Semanjski, I.; Gautama, S. 2019. A collaborative stakeholder decision-making approach for sustainable urban logistics, Sustainability 11(1): 234. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010234
Sharav, N.; Szeinuk, M.; Shiftan, Y. 2018. Does your city need a metro? – A Tel Aviv case study, Case Studies on Transport Policy 6(4): 537–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.07.002
Shekhovtsov, A.; Kozlov, V.; Nosov, V.; Sałabun, W. 2020. Efficiency of methods for determining the relevance of criteria in sustainable transport problems: a comparative case study, Sustainability 12(19): 7915. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197915
Shishegaran, A.; Shishegaran, A.; Mazzulla, G.; Forciniti, C. 2020. A novel approach for a sustainability evaluation of developing system interchange: the case study of the Sheikhfazolah-Yadegar interchange, Tehran, Iran, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(2): 435. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020435
Shmelev, S. E.; Shmeleva, I. A. 2018. Global urban sustainability assessment: a multidimensional approach, Sustainable Development 26(6): 904–920. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1887
Simongáti, G. 2010. Multi‐criteria decision making support tool for freight integrators: selecting the most sustainable alternative, Transport 25(1): 89–97. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2010.12
Soria-Lara, J. A.; Banister, D. 2018. Evaluating the impacts of transport backcasting scenarios with multi-criteria analysis, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 110: 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.02.004
Spadaro, I.; Pirlone, F. 2021. Sustainable urban mobility plan and health security, Sustainability 13(8): 4403. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084403
Stoilova, S.; Munier, N.; Kendra, M.; Skrúcaný, T. 2020. Multi-criteria evaluation of railway network performance in countries of the TEN-T Orient–East Med corridor, Sustainability 12(4): 1482. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041482
Tadić, S.; Krstić, M.; Roso, V.; Brnjac, N. 2020. Dry port terminal location selection by applying the hybrid grey MCDM model, Sustainability 12(17): 6983. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176983
Tadić, S.; Krstić, M.; Roso, V.; Brnjac, N. 2019. Planning an intermodal terminal for the sustainable transport networks, Sustainability 11(15): 4102. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154102
Tang, J.; McNabola, A.; Misstear, B. 2020. The potential impacts of different traffic management strategies on air pollution and public health for a more sustainable city: a modelling case study from Dublin, Ireland, Sustainable Cities and Society 60: 102229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102229
Turskis, Z.; Antuchevičienė, J.; Keršulienė, V.; Gaidukas, G. 2019. Hybrid group MCDM model to select the most effective alternative of the second runway of the airport, Symmetry 11(6): 792. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11060792
Ullah, K.; Hamid, S.; Mirza, F. M.; Shakoor, U. 2018. Prioritizing the gaseous alternatives for the road transport sector of Pakistan: a multi criteria decision making analysis, Energy 165: 1072–1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.055
Vallée, D.; Zielniewicz, P. 1994. ELECTRE III-IV, Version 3.x: Aspects Méthodologiques. Laboratoire d’Analyse et Modélisation de Systèmes pour l’Aide à la Décision (LAMSADE), Université de Paris, Paris, France. 52 p. (in French).
Van de Kaa, G.; Scholten, D.; Rezaei, J.; Milchram, C. 2017. The battle between battery and fuel cell powered electric vehicles: a BWM approach, Energies 10(11): 1707. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10111707
Vermote, L.; Macharis, C.; Putman, K. 2013. A road network for freight transport in Flanders: multi-actor multi-criteria assessment of alternative ring ways, Sustainability 5(10): 4222–4246. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5104222
Vo, T. T. Q.; Xia, A.; Rogan, F.; Wall, D. M.; Murphy, J. D. 2017. Sustainability assessment of large-scale storage technologies for surplus electricity using group multi-criteria decision analysis, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 19(3): 689–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1250-8
Wang, Z.; Subramanian, N.; Abdulrahman, M. D.; Hong, C.; Wu, L.; Liu, C. 2017. Port sustainable services innovation: Ningbo port users’ expectation, Sustainable Production and Consumption 11: 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2016.08.002
Ward, E. J.; Dimitriou, H. T.; Dean, M. 2016. Theory and background of multi-criteria analysis: Toward a policy-led approach to mega transport infrastructure project appraisal, Research in Transportation Economics 58: 21–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2016.08.003
Wątróbski, J.; Małecki, K.; Kijewska, K.; Iwan, S.; Karczmarczyk, A.; Thompson, R. G. 2017. Multi-criteria analysis of electric vans for city logistics, Sustainability 9(8): 1453. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081453
Yang, C.-H.; Lee, K.-C; Chen, H.-C. 2016. Incorporating carbon footprint with activity-based costing constraints into sustainable public transport infrastructure project decisions, Journal of Cleaner Production 133: 1154–1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.014
Yang, L.; Van Dam, K. H.; Zhang, L. 2020. Developing goals and indicators for the design of sustainable and integrated transport infrastructure and urban spaces, Sustainability 12(22): 9677. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229677
Yazdani, M.; Pamucar, D.; Chatterjee, P.; Chakraborty, S. 2020. Development of a decision support framework for sustainable freight transport system evaluation using rough numbers, International Journal of Production Research 58(14): 4325–4351. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1651945
Yazdani, M.; Zarate, P.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. 2019. A combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems, Management Decision 57(9): 2501–2519. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2017-0458
Zadeh, L. 1963. Optimality and non-scalar-valued performance criteria, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 8(1): 59–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1963.1105511
Zagorskas, J; Turskis, Z. 2020a. Location preferences of new pedestrian bridges based on multi-criteria decision-making and GIS-based estimation, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 15(2): 158–181. https://doi.org/10.7250/bjrbe.2020-15.478
Zagorskas, J.; Turskis, Z. 2020b. Setting priority list for construction works of bicycle path segments based on Eckenrode rating and ARAS-F decision support method integrated in GIS, Transport 35(2): 179–192. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2020.12478
Zanakis, S. H.; Solomon, A.; Wishart, N.; Dublish, S. 1998. Multi-attribute decision making: a simulation comparison of select methods, European Journal of Operational Research 107(3): 507–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00147-1
Zapolskytė, S.; Vabuolytė, V.; Burinskienė, M.; Antuchevičienė, J. 2020. Assessment of sustainable mobility by MCDM methods in the science and technology parks of Vilnius, Lithuania, Sustainability 12(23): 9947. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239947
Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A.; Šarka, V. 1994. The new method of multicriteria complex proportional assessment of projects, Ūkio technologinis ir ekonominis vystymas 3: 131–139.
Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. 2010. A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision‐making, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 16(2): 159–172. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.10
Zhang, B.; Qi, R. 2021. Transportation infrastructure, innovation capability, and urban economic development, Transformations in Business & Economics 20(3C): 526–545.
Zhao, C.; Xu, S.; Wu, M.; Yao, S.; Luo, X. 2022. Load flow prediction of intelligent logistics transportation network based on LSTM algorithm, Transformations in Business & Economics 21(2): 305–321.
Aljohani, K.; Thompson, R. G. 2019. A stakeholder-based evaluation of the most suitable and sustainable delivery fleet for freight consolidation policies in the inner-city area, Sustainability 11(1): 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010124
Alzouby, A. M.; Nusair, A. A.; Taha, L. M. 2019. GIS based multi criteria decision analysis for analyzing accessibility of the disabled in the Greater Irbid municipality area, Irbid, Jordan, Alexandria Engineering Journal 58(2): 689–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2019.05.015
Antanasijević, D.; Pocajt, V.; Ristić, M.; Perić-Grujić, A. 2017. A differential multi-criteria analysis for the assessment of sustainability performance of European countries: beyond country ranking, Journal of Cleaner Production 165: 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.131
Awad-Núñez, S.; González-Cancelas, N.; Soler-Flores, F.; Camarero-Orive, A. 2015. How should the sustainability of the location of dry ports be measured? A proposed methodology using Bayesian networks and multi-criteria decision analysis, Transport 30(3): 312–319. https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2015.1081618
Awasthi, A.; Govindan, K.; Gold, S. 2018. Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach, International Journal of Production Economics 195: 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.013
Azapagic, A.; Chalabi, Z.; Fletcher, T.; Grundy, C.; Jones, M.; Leonardi, G.; Osammor, O.; Sharifi, V.; Swithenbank, J.; Tiwary, A.; Vardoulakis, S. 2013. An integrated approach to assessing the environmental and health impacts of pollution in the urban environment: methodology and a case study, Process Safety and Environmental Protection 91(6): 508–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2012.11.004
Bai, C.; Fahimnia, B.; Sarkis, J. 2017. Sustainable transport fleet appraisal using a hybrid multi-objective decision making approach, Annals of Operations Research 250(2): 309–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-2009-z
Bana e Costa, C. A.; De Corte J.-M.; Vansnick, J.-C. 2012. MACBETH, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 11(2): 359–387. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622012400068
Bandeira, R. A. M.; D’Agosto, M. A.; Ribeiro, S. K.; Bandeira, A. P. F.; Goes, G. V. 2018. A fuzzy multi-criteria model for evaluating sustainable urban freight transportation operations, Journal of Cleaner Production 184: 727–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.234
Barfod, M. B. 2018. Supporting sustainable transport appraisals using stakeholder involvement and MCDA, Transport 33(4): 1052–1066. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2018.6596
Barfod, M. B.; Salling, K. B. 2015. A new composite decision support framework for strategic and sustainable transport appraisals, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 72: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.12.001
Barradale, M. J.; Cornet, Y. 2018. Developing assessment criteria for sustainable transport appraisal, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2672(3): 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118799033
Bivina, G. R.; Parida, M. 2020. Prioritizing pedestrian needs using a multi-criteria decision approach for a sustainable built environment in the Indian context, Environment, Development and Sustainability 22(5): 4929–4950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00381-w
Blagojević, A.; Stević, Ž.; Marinković, D.; Kasalica, S.; Rajilić, S. 2020. A novel entropy-fuzzy PIPRECIA-DEA model for safety evaluation of railway traffic, Symmetry 12(9): 1479. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12091479
Boisjoly, G.; El-Geneidy, A. M. 2017. How to get there? A critical assessment of accessibility objectives and indicators in metropolitan transportation plans, Transport Policy 55: 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.12.011
Bouhana, A.; Zidi, A.; Fekih, A.; Chabchoub, H.; Abed, M. 2015. An ontology-based CBR approach for personalized itinerary search systems for sustainable urban freight transport, Expert Systems with Applications 42(7): 3724–3741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.12.012
Brans, J. P.; Mareschal, B. 1992. PROMETHEE V: MCDM problems with segmentation constraints, INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research 30(2): 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/03155986.1992.11732186
Brauers, W. K. M.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2010. Project management by MULTIMOORA as an instrument for transition economies, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 16(1): 5–24. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.01
Broniewicz, E; Ogrodnik, K. 2020. Multi-criteria analysis of transport infrastructure projects, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 83: 102351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102351
Brůhová Foltýnová, H.; Vejchodská, E.; Rybová, K.; Květoň, V. 2020. Sustainable urban mobility: one definition, different stakeholders’ opinions, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 87: 102465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102465
Bulckaen, J; Keseru, I; Macharis, C. 2016. Sustainability versus stakeholder preferences: Searching for synergies in urban and regional mobility measures, Research in Transportation Economics 55: 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2016.04.009
Cadena, P. C. B.; Magro, J. M. V. 2015. Setting the weights of sustainability criteria for the appraisal of transport projects, Transport 30(3): 298–306. https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2015.1086890
Casanovas-Rubio, M. M.; Ramos, G.; Armengou, J. 2020. Minimizing the social impact of construction work on mobility: a decision-making method, Sustainability 12(3): 1183. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031183
Castillo, H.; Pitfield, D. E. 2010. ELASTIC – a methodological framework for identifying and selecting sustainable transport indicators, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 15(4): 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2009.09.002
Chen, C.; Achtari, G.; Majkut, K.; Sheu, J.-B. 2017. Balancing equity and cost in rural transportation management with multi-objective utility analysis and data envelopment analysis: a case of Quinte West, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 95: 148–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.10.015
Chen, Z.-S.; Li, M.; Kong, W.-T.; Chin, K.-S. 2019. Evaluation and selection of HazMat transportation alternatives: a PHFLTS- and TOPSIS-integrated multi-perspective approach, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16(21): 4116. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214116
Cieśla, M.; Sobota, A.; Jacyna, M. 2020. Multi-criteria decision making process in metropolitan transport means selection based on the sharing mobility idea, Sustainability 12(17): 7231. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177231
Cornet, Y.; Barradale, M. J.; Barfod, M. B.; Hickman, R. 2018. Giving current and future generations a real voice: a practical method for constructing sustainability viewpoints in transport appraisal, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 18(3): 316–339. https://doi.org/10.18757/EJTIR.2018.18.3.3244
Corral, S; Hernandez, Y. 2017. Social sensitivity analyses applied to environmental assessment processes, Ecological Economics 141: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.05.022
Del Amo, I. F.; Erkoyuncu, J. A.; Roy, R.; Palmarini, R.; Onoufriou, D. 2018. A systematic review of augmented reality content-related techniques for knowledge transfer in maintenance applications, Computers in Industry 103: 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.08.007
Delibasic, M. 2022. Institutional imbalance of interests in maritime transport and sustainable development, Transformations in Business & Economics 21(1): 263–273.
Dimitriou, H. T; Ward, E. J; Dean, M. 2016. Presenting the case for the application of multi-criteria analysis to mega transport infrastructure project appraisal, Research in Transportation Economics 58: 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2016.08.002
Duleba, S.; Moslem, S. 2018. Sustainable urban transport development with stakeholder participation, an AHP-Kendall model: a case study for Mersin, Sustainability 10(10): 3647. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103647
EC. 2019. The European Green Deal. European Commission (EC). Available from Internet: https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en
Edwards, W. 1977. How to use multiattribute utility measurement for social decisionmaking, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 7(5): 326–340. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1977.4309720
Edwards, W.; Barron, F. H. 1994. SMARTS and SMARTER: improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 60(3): 306–325. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1087
Ekener, E.; Hansson, J.; Larsson, A.; Peck, P. 2018. Developing life cycle sustainability assessment methodology by applying values-based sustainability weighting – tested on biomass based and fossil transportation fuels, Journal of Cleaner Production 181: 337–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.211
Erdogan, M.; Kaya, I. 2019. Prioritizing failures by using hybrid multi criteria decision making methodology with a real case application, Sustainable Cities and Society 45: 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.027
Eurostat. 2024. Database. Available from Internet: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database
Feitó-Cespón, M.; Sarache, W.; Piedra-Jimenez, F.; Cespón-Castro, R. 2017. Redesign of a sustainable reverse supply chain under uncertainty: a case study, Journal of Cleaner Production 151: 206–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.057
Fishburn, P. C. 1967. Methods of estimating additive utilities, Management Science 13(7): 435–453. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.13.7.435
Gabus, A.; Fontela, E. 1972. World Problems, An Invitation to Further Thought Within the Framework of DEMATEL. Battelle Geneva Research Center, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ghorbanzadeh, O.; Moslem, S.; Blaschke, T.; Duleba, S. 2019. Sustainable urban transport planning considering different stakeholder groups by an interval-AHP decision support model, Sustainability 11(1): 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010009
Gomes, L.; Lima, M. 1991. TODIM: basics and application to multicriteria ranking of projects with environmental impacts, Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences 16(3–4): 113–127.
Grant M. J.; Booth A. 2009. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies, Health Information & Libraries Journal 26(2): 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Griškevičiūtė-Gečienė, A. 2010. The evaluation of investment projects within the territory of development, Transport 25(2): 203–214. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2010.25
Henke, I.; Cartenì, A.; Di Francesco, L. 2020. A Sustainable evaluation processes for investments in the transport sector: a combined multi-criteria and cost–benefit analysis for a new highway in Italy, Sustainability 12(23): 9854. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239854
Hickman, R.; Saxena, S.; Banister, D.; Ashiru, O. 2012. Examining transport futures with scenario analysis and MCA, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 46(3): 560–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.11.006
Höfer, T.; Madlener, R. 2020. A participatory stakeholder process for evaluating sustainable energy transition scenarios, Energy Policy 139: 111277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111277
Huang, H.; De Smet, Y.; Macharis, C.; Doan, N. A. V. 2021. Collaborative decision-making in sustainable mobility: identifying possible consensuses in the multi-actor multi-criteria analysis based on inverse mixed-integer linear optimization, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 28(1): 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1795005
Hwang, C.-L.; Yoon, K. 1981. Methods for multiple attribute decision making, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 186: 58–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3
Jacyna, M. 2006. The multiobjective optimisation to evaluation of the infrastructure adjustment to transport needs, in K. G. Goulias (Ed.). Transport Science and Technology, 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1108/9780080467542-031
Jakimavičius, M.; Burinskienė, M. 2009. A GIS and multi‐criteria‐based analysis and ranking of transportation zones of Vilnius city, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 15(1): 39–48. https://doi.org/10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.39-48
Jasti, P. C.; Ram, V. V. 2019a. Integrated and sustainable benchmarking of metro rail system using analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy logic: a case study of Mumbai, Urban Rail Transit 5(3): 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40864-019-00107-1
Jasti, P. C.; Ram, V. V. 2019b. Sustainable benchmarking of a public transport system using analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy logic: a case study of Hyderabad, India, Public Transport 11(3): 457–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-019-00219-8
Jones, S.; Tefe, M.; Appiah-Opoku, S. 2013. Proposed framework for sustainability screening of urban transport projects in developing countries: A case study of Accra, Ghana, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 49: 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.003
Josimović, B.; Krunić, N.; Nenković-Riznić, M. 2016. The impact of airport noise as part of a strategic environmental assessment, case study: the Tivat (Montenegro) airport expansion plan, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 49: 271–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.10.005
Karolemeas, C.; Tsigdinos, S.; Tzouras, P. G.; Nikitas, A.; Bakogiannis, E. 2021. Determining electric vehicle charging station location suitability: a qualitative study of Greek stakeholders employing thematic analysis and analytical hierarchy process, Sustainability 13(4): 2298. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042298
Keeney, R. L. 1982. Decision analysis: an overview, Operations Research 30(5): 803–838. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.30.5.803
Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H. 1993. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press. 592 p.
Keršulienė, V.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. 2010. Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA), Journal of Business Economics and Management 11(2): 243–258. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2010.12
Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Olfat, L., Turskis, Z. 2015. Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS), Informatica 26(3): 435–451. https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2015.57
Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z.; Antuchevičienė, J. 2016. A new combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method for multi-criteria decision-making, Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research 50(3): 25–44. Available from Internet: https://ecocyb.ase.ro/nr20163/02%20-%20Mehdi%20K.%20GHORABAEE,%20Ed.%20Zavadskas(T).pdf
Keshkamat, S. S.; Looijen, J. M.; Zuidgeest, M. H. P. 2009. The formulation and evaluation of transport route planning alternatives: a spatial decision support system for the Via Baltica project, Poland, Journal of Transport Geography 17(1): 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.04.010
Kijewska, K.; Torbacki, W.; Iwan, S. 2018. Application of AHP and DEMATEL methods in choosing and analysing the measures for the distribution of goods in Szczecin region, Sustainability 10(7): 2365. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072365
Krajangsri, T.; Pongpeng, J. 2019. Sustainable infrastructure assessment model: an application to road projects, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 23(3): 973–984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-1007-0
Kramar, U.; Dragan, D.; Topolšek, D. 2019. The holistic approach to urban mobility planning with a modified focus group, swot, and fuzzy analytical hierarchical process, Sustainability 11(23): 6599. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236599
Kumar, A.; Anbanandam, R. 2021. Environmentally responsible freight transport service providers’ assessment under data-driven information uncertainty, Journal of Enterprise Information Management 34(1): 506–542. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-12-2019-0403
Le Boennec, R.; Nicolaï, I.; Da Costa, P. 2019. Assessing 50 innovative mobility offers in low-density areas: a French application using a two-step decision-aid method, Transport Policy 83: 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.08.003
Lebeau, P.; Macharis, C.; Van Mierlo, J.; Janjevic, M. 2018. Improving policy support in city logistics: the contributions of a multi-actor multi-criteria analysis, Case Studies on Transport Policy 6(4): 554–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.07.003
Lee, J.; Arts, J.; Vanclay, F. 2021. Stakeholder views about land use and transport integration in a rapidly-growing megacity: social outcomes and integrated planning issues in Seoul, Sustainable Cities and Society 67: 102759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102759
Ma, F.; Shi, W.; Yuen, K. F.; Sun, Q.; Guo, Y. R. 2019. Multi-stakeholders’ assessment of bike sharing service quality based on DEMATEL–VIKOR method, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications: a Leading Journal of Supply Chain Management 22(5): 449–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2019.1568401
MacCrimmon, K. R. 1968. Decision making Among Multiple-Attribute Alternatives: A Survey and Consolidated Approach. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, US. 78 p. Available from Internet: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/RM4823.html
Macharis, C.; Milan, L. 2015. Transition through dialogue: a stakeholder based decision process for cities: the case of city distribution, Habitat International 45: 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.06.026
Macharis, C.; Turcksin, L.; Lebeau, K. 2012. Multi actor multi criteria analysis (MAMCA) as a tool to support sustainable decisions: state of use, Decision Support Systems 54(1): 610–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.08.008
Marleau Donais, F.; Abi-Zeid, I.; Waygood, E. O. D.; Lavoie, R. 2019. Assessing and ranking the potential of a street to be redesigned as a complete street: a multi-criteria decision aiding approach, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 124: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.02.006
Mohagheghi, V.; Mousavi, S. M.; Aghamohagheghi, M.; Vahdani, B. 2017. A new approach of multi-criteria analysis for the evaluation and selection of sustainable transport investment projects under uncertainty: a case study, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 10(1): 605–626. https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.2017.10.1.41
Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D. G. 2010. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement, International Journal of Surgery 8(5): 336–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007
Moslem, S.; Campisi, T.; Szmelter-Jarosz, A.; Duleba, S.; Nahiduzzaman, K. M.; Tesoriere, G. 2020. Best–worst method for modelling mobility choice after COVID-19: Evidence from Italy, Sustainability 12(17): 6824. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176824
Moslem, S.; Ghorbanzadeh, O.; Blaschke, T.; Duleba, S. 2019. Analysing stakeholder consensus for a sustainable transport development decision by the fuzzy AHP and interval AHP, Sustainability 11(12): 3271. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123271
Mukherjee, S. 2017. Selection of alternative fuels for sustainable urban transportation under multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy environment, Fuzzy Information and Engineering 9(1): 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fiae.2017.03.006
Munda, G. 1995. Multicriteria Evaluation in a Fuzzy Environment: Theory and Applications in Ecological Economics. Springer. 255 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-49997-5
Munier, N. 2016. A new approach to the rank reversal phenomenon in MCDM with the SIMUS method, Multiple Criteria Decision Making 11: 137–152. https://doi.org/10.22367/mcdm.2016.11.09
Neofytou, H.; Sarafidis, Y.; Gkonis, N.; Mirasgedis, S.; Askounis, D. 2020. Energy efficiency contribution to sustainable development: a multi-criteria approach in Greece, Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 15(10–12): 572–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2020.1849449
Nguyen, T. T.; Brunner, H.; Hirz, M. 2020. Towards a holistic sustainability evaluation for transport alternatives, European Journal of Sustainable Development 9(4): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2020.v9n4p1
Nowakowski, P.; Król, A. 2021. The influence of preliminary processing of end-of-life tires on transportation cost and vehicle exhausts emissions, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28(19): 24256–24269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07421-y
Ogrodnik, K. 2020. Multi-criteria analysis of smart cities in Poland, Geographia Polonica 93(2): 163–181. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0168
Oltean-Dumbrava, C.; Miah, A. 2016. Assessment and relative sustainability of common types of roadside noise barriers, Journal of Cleaner Production 135: 919–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.107
Oltean-Dumbrava, C.; Watts, G.; Miah, A. 2016. Towards a more sustainable surface transport infrastructure: a case study of applying multi criteria analysis techniques to assess the sustainability of transport noise reducing devices, Journal of Cleaner Production 112: 2922–2934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.096
Oltean-Dumbrava, C.; Watts, G.; Miah, A. 2013. Transport infrastructure: making more sustainable decisions for noise reduction, Journal of Cleaner Production 42: 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.008
Opricović, S. 1998. Višekriterijumska optimizacija sistema u građevinarstvu. Doktorska disertacija. Građevinski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Srbija. 302 s. (in Serbian).
Ortega, J.; Moslem, S.; Tóth, J.; Péter, T.; Palaguachi, J.; Paguay, M. 2020. Using best worst method for sustainable park and ride facility location, Sustainability 12(23): 10083. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310083
Oses, U.; Rojí, E.; Gurrutxaga, I.; Larrauri, M. 2017. A multidisciplinary sustainability index to assess transport in urban areas: a case study of Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 60(11): 1891–1922. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1264374
Palevičius, V.; Burinskienė, M.; Podvezko, V.; Paliulis, G. M.; Šarkienė, E.; Šaparauskas, J. 2016. Research on the demand for parking lots of shopping centres, E&M Economics and Management 19(3): 173–194. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2016-3-012
Pamucar, D.; Deveci, M.; Canıtez, F.; Bozanic, D. 2020. A fuzzy full consistency method-Dombi-Bonferroni model for prioritizing transportation demand management measures, Applied Soft Computing 87: 105952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105952
Pamučar, D.; Ćirović, G. 2015. The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC), Expert Systems with Applications 42(6): 3016–3028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.057
Pamučar, D.; Stević, Ž.; Sremac, S. 2018. A new model for determining weight coefficients of criteria in MCDM models: full consistency method (FUCOM), Symmetry 10(9): 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10090393
Paul, A.; Moktadir, M. A.; Paul, S. K. 2020. An innovative decision-making framework for evaluating transportation service providers based on sustainable criteria, International Journal of Production Research 58(24): 7334–7352. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1652779
Pettit, C.; Chung, W.; Sharifi, V.; Chalabi, Z.; Fletcher, T.; Cleall, P.; Thomas, H.; De Munck, C.; Sinnett, D.; Jefferies, S.; Jones, M.; Azapagic, A. 2011. Sustainable management of urban pollution: an integrated approach, Building Services Engineering Research and Technology 32(1): 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143624410394528
Phdungsilp, A. 2010. Integrated energy and carbon modeling with a decision support system: Policy scenarios for low-carbon city development in Bangkok, Energy Policy 38(9): 4808–4817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.026
Pryn, M. R.; Cornet, Y.; Salling, K. B. 2015. Applying sustainability theory to transport infrastructure assessment using a multiplicative AHP decision support model, Transport 30(3): 330–341. https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2015.1081281
Raiffa, H. 1997. Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices under Uncertainty. McGraw-Hill. 309 p.
Rezaei, J. 2015. Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method, Omega 53: 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009
Ribeiro, P.; Fonseca, F.; Santos, P. 2020. Sustainability assessment of a bus system in a mid-sized municipality, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 63(2): 236–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2019.1577224
Roy, B. 1968. Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples (la méthode ELECTRE), R.I.R.O 2(8): 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/196802V100571 (in French).
Rybarczyk, G.; Wu, C. 2010. Bicycle facility planning using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis, Applied Geography 30(2): 282–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.08.005
Rześny-Cieplińska, J.; Szmelter-Jarosz, A.; Moslem, S. 2021. Priority-based stakeholders analysis in the view of sustainable city logistics: evidence for Tricity, Poland, Sustainable Cities and Society 67: 102751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102751
Saaty, T. L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill. 287 p.
Saaty, T. L. 2001. The Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback. 2nd edition. RWS Publications. 370 p.
Sałabun, W. 2015. The characteristic objects method: a new distance-based approach to multicriteria decision-making problems, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Optimization, Learning, and Decision Support 22(1–2): 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1525
Sałabun, W.; Palczewski, K.; Wątróbski, J. 2019. Multicriteria approach to sustainable transport evaluation under incomplete knowledge: electric bikes case study, Sustainability 11(12): 3314. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123314
Salling, K. B.; Barfod, M. B.; Pryn, M. R.; Leleur, S. 2018. Flexible decision support for sustainable development: the SUSTAIN framework model, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 18(3): 295–315. https://doi.org/10.18757/ejtir.2018.18.3.3242
Salling, K. B.; Pryn, M. R. 2015. Sustainable transport project evaluation and decision support: indicators and planning criteria for sustainable development, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 22(4): 346–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2015.1051497
San-José Lombera, J. T.; Cuadrado, J. 2010. Industrial building design stage based on a system approach to their environmental sustainability, Construction and Building Materials 24(4): 438–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.10.019
Sayyadi, R.; Awasthi, A. 2020. An integrated approach based on system dynamics and ANP for evaluating sustainable transportation policies, International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics 7(2): 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2018.1554168
Schmale, J.; Von Schneidemesser, E.; Dörrie, A. 2015. An integrated assessment method for sustainable transport system planning in a middle sized German city, Sustainability 7(2): 1329–1354. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7021329
Semanjski, I.; Gautama, S. 2019. A collaborative stakeholder decision-making approach for sustainable urban logistics, Sustainability 11(1): 234. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010234
Sharav, N.; Szeinuk, M.; Shiftan, Y. 2018. Does your city need a metro? – A Tel Aviv case study, Case Studies on Transport Policy 6(4): 537–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.07.002
Shekhovtsov, A.; Kozlov, V.; Nosov, V.; Sałabun, W. 2020. Efficiency of methods for determining the relevance of criteria in sustainable transport problems: a comparative case study, Sustainability 12(19): 7915. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197915
Shishegaran, A.; Shishegaran, A.; Mazzulla, G.; Forciniti, C. 2020. A novel approach for a sustainability evaluation of developing system interchange: the case study of the Sheikhfazolah-Yadegar interchange, Tehran, Iran, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(2): 435. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020435
Shmelev, S. E.; Shmeleva, I. A. 2018. Global urban sustainability assessment: a multidimensional approach, Sustainable Development 26(6): 904–920. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1887
Simongáti, G. 2010. Multi‐criteria decision making support tool for freight integrators: selecting the most sustainable alternative, Transport 25(1): 89–97. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2010.12
Soria-Lara, J. A.; Banister, D. 2018. Evaluating the impacts of transport backcasting scenarios with multi-criteria analysis, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 110: 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.02.004
Spadaro, I.; Pirlone, F. 2021. Sustainable urban mobility plan and health security, Sustainability 13(8): 4403. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084403
Stoilova, S.; Munier, N.; Kendra, M.; Skrúcaný, T. 2020. Multi-criteria evaluation of railway network performance in countries of the TEN-T Orient–East Med corridor, Sustainability 12(4): 1482. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041482
Tadić, S.; Krstić, M.; Roso, V.; Brnjac, N. 2020. Dry port terminal location selection by applying the hybrid grey MCDM model, Sustainability 12(17): 6983. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176983
Tadić, S.; Krstić, M.; Roso, V.; Brnjac, N. 2019. Planning an intermodal terminal for the sustainable transport networks, Sustainability 11(15): 4102. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154102
Tang, J.; McNabola, A.; Misstear, B. 2020. The potential impacts of different traffic management strategies on air pollution and public health for a more sustainable city: a modelling case study from Dublin, Ireland, Sustainable Cities and Society 60: 102229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102229
Turskis, Z.; Antuchevičienė, J.; Keršulienė, V.; Gaidukas, G. 2019. Hybrid group MCDM model to select the most effective alternative of the second runway of the airport, Symmetry 11(6): 792. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11060792
Ullah, K.; Hamid, S.; Mirza, F. M.; Shakoor, U. 2018. Prioritizing the gaseous alternatives for the road transport sector of Pakistan: a multi criteria decision making analysis, Energy 165: 1072–1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.055
Vallée, D.; Zielniewicz, P. 1994. ELECTRE III-IV, Version 3.x: Aspects Méthodologiques. Laboratoire d’Analyse et Modélisation de Systèmes pour l’Aide à la Décision (LAMSADE), Université de Paris, Paris, France. 52 p. (in French).
Van de Kaa, G.; Scholten, D.; Rezaei, J.; Milchram, C. 2017. The battle between battery and fuel cell powered electric vehicles: a BWM approach, Energies 10(11): 1707. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10111707
Vermote, L.; Macharis, C.; Putman, K. 2013. A road network for freight transport in Flanders: multi-actor multi-criteria assessment of alternative ring ways, Sustainability 5(10): 4222–4246. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5104222
Vo, T. T. Q.; Xia, A.; Rogan, F.; Wall, D. M.; Murphy, J. D. 2017. Sustainability assessment of large-scale storage technologies for surplus electricity using group multi-criteria decision analysis, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 19(3): 689–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1250-8
Wang, Z.; Subramanian, N.; Abdulrahman, M. D.; Hong, C.; Wu, L.; Liu, C. 2017. Port sustainable services innovation: Ningbo port users’ expectation, Sustainable Production and Consumption 11: 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2016.08.002
Ward, E. J.; Dimitriou, H. T.; Dean, M. 2016. Theory and background of multi-criteria analysis: Toward a policy-led approach to mega transport infrastructure project appraisal, Research in Transportation Economics 58: 21–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2016.08.003
Wątróbski, J.; Małecki, K.; Kijewska, K.; Iwan, S.; Karczmarczyk, A.; Thompson, R. G. 2017. Multi-criteria analysis of electric vans for city logistics, Sustainability 9(8): 1453. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081453
Yang, C.-H.; Lee, K.-C; Chen, H.-C. 2016. Incorporating carbon footprint with activity-based costing constraints into sustainable public transport infrastructure project decisions, Journal of Cleaner Production 133: 1154–1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.014
Yang, L.; Van Dam, K. H.; Zhang, L. 2020. Developing goals and indicators for the design of sustainable and integrated transport infrastructure and urban spaces, Sustainability 12(22): 9677. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229677
Yazdani, M.; Pamucar, D.; Chatterjee, P.; Chakraborty, S. 2020. Development of a decision support framework for sustainable freight transport system evaluation using rough numbers, International Journal of Production Research 58(14): 4325–4351. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1651945
Yazdani, M.; Zarate, P.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. 2019. A combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems, Management Decision 57(9): 2501–2519. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2017-0458
Zadeh, L. 1963. Optimality and non-scalar-valued performance criteria, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 8(1): 59–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1963.1105511
Zagorskas, J; Turskis, Z. 2020a. Location preferences of new pedestrian bridges based on multi-criteria decision-making and GIS-based estimation, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 15(2): 158–181. https://doi.org/10.7250/bjrbe.2020-15.478
Zagorskas, J.; Turskis, Z. 2020b. Setting priority list for construction works of bicycle path segments based on Eckenrode rating and ARAS-F decision support method integrated in GIS, Transport 35(2): 179–192. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2020.12478
Zanakis, S. H.; Solomon, A.; Wishart, N.; Dublish, S. 1998. Multi-attribute decision making: a simulation comparison of select methods, European Journal of Operational Research 107(3): 507–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00147-1
Zapolskytė, S.; Vabuolytė, V.; Burinskienė, M.; Antuchevičienė, J. 2020. Assessment of sustainable mobility by MCDM methods in the science and technology parks of Vilnius, Lithuania, Sustainability 12(23): 9947. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239947
Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A.; Šarka, V. 1994. The new method of multicriteria complex proportional assessment of projects, Ūkio technologinis ir ekonominis vystymas 3: 131–139.
Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. 2010. A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision‐making, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 16(2): 159–172. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.10
Zhang, B.; Qi, R. 2021. Transportation infrastructure, innovation capability, and urban economic development, Transformations in Business & Economics 20(3C): 526–545.
Zhao, C.; Xu, S.; Wu, M.; Yao, S.; Luo, X. 2022. Load flow prediction of intelligent logistics transportation network based on LSTM algorithm, Transformations in Business & Economics 21(2): 305–321.